Key points at a glance
- The initiative called for measures if, two years after its adoption, costs grew more than 20% faster than wages.
- On 09.06.2024, the people and the cantons rejected it with 62.77% of votes against.
- The counter-proposal has applied since 01.01.2026: the Federal Council sets cost and quality targets for four years at a time (Art. 54 KVG).
- The first targets apply to 2028, because they are only set two years after the entry into force.
- A commission monitors the development of costs and issues recommendations; the law does not require direct premium cuts.
What is the cost brake initiative?
The cost brake initiative, officially the popular initiative “For lower premiums – cost brake in the healthcare system” (Kostenbremse-Initiative), was a federal popular initiative of the Centre party, submitted in 2020. It sought to curb the costs of basic health insurance by linking their growth to the development of wages and the economy as a whole. If costs had grown considerably faster, the Confederation and the cantons would have had to intervene.
The background is the development of costs. According to the FOPH, the costs of basic health insurance per person rose by 31% from 2012 to 2022, while nominal wages rose by 6% over the same period. Since the Federal Health Insurance Act (KVG) was introduced in 1996, the gross costs of basic health insurance have grown by 302%. Because premiums must cover costs, premiums rise along with healthcare costs.
The Federal Council and Parliament shared the aim but rejected the initiative. They argued that the mechanism was too rigid and did not take account of factors such as the ageing population or medical progress. On 09.06.2024, the people and the cantons rejected the initiative with 62.77% voting no. The premium relief initiative also failed on the same day.
An indirect counter-proposal has been in force since 01.01.2026: an amendment to the KVG that introduces cost and quality targets. It is one of a series of cost containment measures.
How it works
What the initiative would have required: the Confederation, the cantons, health insurers and service providers would have had to ensure that costs did not rise much faster than wages and the economy as a whole. If, two years after its adoption, costs had grown more than 20% faster than wages and the tariff partners had not taken action, the Confederation and the cantons would have had to adopt cost-containing measures taking effect the following year. Parliament would have had to lay down the details in law.
What the counter-proposal governs:
- Federal targets: after consulting insurers, insured persons, cantons and service providers, the Federal Council sets cost and quality targets for basic health insurance benefits for four years at a time.
- Deadline: the targets must be set no later than twelve months before the start of the period.
- Cantonal targets: each canton can set its own cost and quality targets; in doing so, it must take the Federal Council’s targets into account and consult insurers, insured persons and service providers.
- Monitoring: a federal Commission for Cost and Quality Monitoring monitors the development of individual areas of benefits, issues recommendations to the Confederation and the tariff partners and publishes its decisions.
The first targets are set for the calendar year that begins two years after the entry into force. With entry into force on 01.01.2026, that is 2028. Because the targets must be set twelve months in advance, the Federal Council will set them by the end of 2026 at the latest.
Legal basis
The initiative would have amended the Federal Constitution; it was rejected. The law in force is the counter-proposal, the KVG amendment of 29.09.2023 “Cost containment measures – setting cost and quality targets”, in force since 01.01.2026:
- Art. 54 KVG: after consulting insurers, insured persons, cantons and service providers, the Federal Council sets cost and quality targets for four years at a time.
- Art. 54a KVG: each canton can set its own targets for four years, taking the Federal Council’s targets into account; it first consults insurers, insured persons and service providers.
- Art. 54b KVG: the targets are set no later than twelve months before the start of the period.
- Art. 54c KVG: a federal Commission for Cost and Quality Monitoring monitors the areas of benefits, issues recommendations and publishes its decisions. Insurers, insured persons, cantons, service providers and experts are represented on it.
- Transitional provision: the targets are set for the first time for the calendar year that begins after two years have elapsed since the entry into force.
According to the FOPH, the Federal Council decided on 26.11.2025 to bring the amendments to the KVG and KVV into force on 01.01.2026.
Example: how the initiative’s mechanism would have calculated
The initiative was rejected, but its mechanism helps to understand the debate. The growth rates in the table are illustrative values, not forecasts. The rule: intervene if cost growth is more than 20% above wage growth.
| Wage growth | Threshold (wage growth + 20%) | Cost growth | Intervention under the initiative? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0% | 2.4% | 2.2% | no |
| 2.0% | 2.4% | 3.0% | yes |
| 1.0% | 1.2% | 3.0% | yes |
What this means for you
The counter-proposal works in the long term and indirectly. It changes nothing measurable for your premium next year. What you can influence yourself:
- Compare premiums: premiums differ considerably within the same municipality depending on insurer, deductible and model. In the premium calculator, you can see all offers with the official FOPH data.
- Consider switching: by changing insurer, deductible or model, you lower your premium directly. Dates and procedures are listed under switching insurer and deadlines.
- Know the insurers: you can find the insurers’ reserves and administrative costs under health insurers.
- Follow developments: the Commission for Cost and Quality Monitoring publishes its decisions. We report on new targets and premium rounds under news.
Common mistakes
- Believing there is a cost brake. The initiative was rejected. What is in force are targets and monitoring, not an automatic brake.
- Expecting an immediate effect. The first targets apply to 2028.
- Equating costs and premiums. The targets concern cost growth. Premiums follow costs, but reserves and risk equalisation also play a part.
- Confusing the two initiatives. The cost brake targeted costs, the premium relief initiative the premium burden on households.
How we analyse premiums and costs is explained under how we calculate.
Frequently asked questions
Was the cost brake initiative accepted?
No. The people and the cantons rejected it on 09.06.2024 with 62.77% voting no. The indirect counter-proposal with cost and quality targets has been in force since 01.01.2026.
Will premiums fall because of the counter-proposal?
Not automatically. The counter-proposal sets targets for cost growth and requires monitoring. Premiums still depend on actual costs. Whether the targets slow growth will become apparent in 2028 at the earliest.
What is the difference from the premium relief initiative?
The cost brake addressed healthcare costs, the premium relief initiative the premium burden on households. Both were rejected on 09.06.2024, and each has had its own counter-proposal in force since 2026.
Who sets the cost and quality targets?
The Federal Council, after consulting insurers, insured persons, cantons and service providers, for four years at a time. The cantons can set their own targets and must take the Federal Council’s targets into account.
Related terms
- Premium relief initiativeThe premium relief initiative sought to ensure that nobody pays more than 10% of their disposable income for health insurance premiums. On 09.06.2024 the people and the cantons rejected it with 55.47% voting no. Since 01.01.2026, the indirect counter-proposal has applied instead: every canton must spend a minimum share of healthcare costs on premium subsidies.
- Cost containmentCost containment is the umbrella term for measures by the Confederation, the cantons and the tariff partners intended to slow cost growth in basic health insurance. Since 2018, the Federal Council has been implementing a programme for this in packages: packages 1a and 1b have applied since 2023 and 2024, and Parliament adopted package 2 on 21.03.2025. The aim is to relieve premium payers and taxpayers.
- Healthcare costsHealthcare costs are all spending on treatment, care, medicines, prevention and administration in the healthcare system. In 2024, the Swiss healthcare system cost 97 billion francs according to the Federal Statistical Office, or CHF 10,792 per person. Households bear almost two thirds, either directly out of their own pocket or through health insurance premiums.
- Single health insurance fundA single health insurance fund is one public health insurer that provides basic health insurance for everyone instead of many insurers. Switzerland does not have one: according to FOPH premium data, 34 health insurers offer basic health insurance in 2026. Voters rejected a single fund in 2007 with 71.2% and in 2014 with 61.8% voting no.
Sources
- Federal Health Insurance Act (KVG), Art. 54 Cost and quality targetsArt. 54 KVGfedlex.admin.ch
- Federal Health Insurance Act (KVG), Art. 54a Cantonal cost and quality targetsArt. 54a KVGfedlex.admin.ch
- Federal Health Insurance Act (KVG), Art. 54b DeadlinesArt. 54b KVGfedlex.admin.ch
- Federal Health Insurance Act (KVG), Art. 54c Commission for Cost and Quality MonitoringArt. 54c KVGfedlex.admin.ch
- KVG, transitional provision to the amendment of 29 September 2023 (cost and quality targets)Transitional provision KVG, amendment of 29.09.2023fedlex.admin.ch
- FOPH: Popular initiative “For lower premiums – cost brake in the healthcare system” (German; no English version)bag.admin.ch
